Future Tech Now
—But Will It Arrive in Time?

—Reviewing James Kunstler’s The Long Emergency * Lindsey Williams and The Oil Non-Crisis * Malthusianism, the Pandora’s Box of Modern Times *
Dr. Bruce Lipton & the New Population Paradigm

By Theodore D. Hall, Ph.D.

“When I got involved in ZP [zero point energy] in 1979, I was warned by Buckminster Fuller that if we were successful there’d be hell to pay.  If we were actually successful, then it could develop into a real nightmare, because the humans we’re dealing with are a species that has been kept in the dark.  We’ve been treated like mushrooms, which are kept in the dark and fed a lot of feces.  There’s no nice way of putting this.”
—Adam Trombly

     It’s my conviction that many of the key technologies of the future exist right now, in one stage of development or another.  So … if these technologies exist now, why don’t we know about them?  Why aren’t they in the market?—or on the way.

     Read Jeane Manning’s The Coming Energy Revolution.  Read Gerry Vassilatos’ Lost Science.  Read the “Futurology” essay in the Sciences section of my website.

*   *   *

     A long-time publisher of information on “exotic” inventions is Val Valerian, of the Leading Edge International Research Group of Yelm (trufax.org).  I called Val yesterday evening with an important question on my mind….

     “Val,” I asked, “do you think it likely, very likely, or most certain, that the military or the black ops complex has a working anti-gravity technology?”

     Behind my question was a decade-long fascination with the prospect of anti-gravity transport.  My interest originated in a dream circa 1997.  In the dream, I was fishing on  Clear Lake, east of Yelm, Washington.  The year was 2029.  Feeling a strange vibration from above, I looked up and saw an immense vessel glide by silently.  I rushed home to tell my wife.   “I just saw the most fantastic UFO!” I exclaimed.  She laughed.  “Sit down and rest, old man,” she said.  “Your memory’s slipping again.  What you saw was just the 7:45 AGF [anti-gravitational freighter] out of Tacoma.”

     “Likely,” Val  replied.  “Why do you ask?”

     “Pipelines,” I said.  “The oil pipelines in the Middle East are extremely vulnerable to sabotage.  Given the growing terrorist threat, it may be that the only oil we can ship out of that region in the future will be oil we carry out in anti-grav tankers.”

      “Looking into free energy might be more apropos,” Val replied, flatly.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, Val is right.  What the world needs now, far more than an AGF, is an exit strategy from oil.  The “free energy” devices that would make possible such an exit exist, but, as the Manning book indicates, they have been suppressed.  From the day J.P. Morgan stopped funding Tesla to just yesterday, the “controllers” have been adamantly opposed to any new-tech energy generation innovations that might threaten their control of the energy market.

The Long Emergency

    In 2005, James Howard Kunstler published a “frightening and important” book called The Long Emergency.  World oil production, Kunstler declares, will peak in 2008, and thereafter, we denizens of the developed countries will find ourselves on a slippery slope down to the next Dark Ages.  In his own words:

     “It has been very hard for Americans—lost in dark raptures of non-stop infotainment, recreational shopping, and compulsive motoring—to make sense of the gathering forces that will fundamentally alter the terms of everyday life in technological society.  Even after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, that collapsed the twin towers of the World Trade Center and sliced through the Pentagon, America is still sleepwalking into the future.  We have walked out of our burning house and we are now headed off the edge of cliff.  Beyond that cliff is an abyss of economic and political disorder on a scale that no one has ever seen before.  I call this coming time the Long Emergency.”

     “What’s the big problem?” you ask.  “We’ll simply learn to do more with less.”  It’s not that simple.  Kunstler: “To move beyond the world oil production peak means that never again will all the nations of the earth combined extract as much oil from the ground as we did at peak, no matter what happens on the demand side.  This has extraordinary implications for oil-based industrial civilization, which is predicated on constant and regular expansion of everything—population, gross domestic product, sales, revenue, housing starts, you name it.” 

     I recommend that you read the Kunstler book, as it’s destined to become one of the most influential treatises of our time.  If you’re more of a “visual person,” see the DVD titled “A Crude Awakening.”  Same message:  The cheap oil era is over, and now we’re heading into very hard times.

      Important to note:  I’m not recommending The Long Emergency because I think the author is correct in all of his conclusions and projections, but because the author’s view will soon become the common view.  The controllers will make sure of this, because it’s a view they approve of.

Contra Kunstler

     Kunstler is correct in his conclusion that we now stand at the threshold of a long emergency, an emergency occasioned not only by the oil situation, but by a number of other adverse factors, the effects of global warming topping the list.  However, certain of his other conclusions call (scream, rather) for critique.  Here, I’d like to deal with just three…

     *Kunstler’s survey of the world’s oil resources indicates that, alas, he hasn’t done his homework.  He makes no mention, for instance, of the eye-opening reports of Lindsey Williams, author of The Energy Non-Crisis (1980) and several other books.

     Williams, who worked in the mid-seventies as a chaplain for the workers building the Alaska pipeline, was an eye-witness to the discovery at Gull Island of an oil pool large enough to make America oil-independent.  What happened to the find?  Within twenty-four hours, the well was capped.  All public reports subsequent to the discovery, declared that the find was insignificant.

      Shocked by the cap and cover-up, Williams has worked ever since, as lecturer and author, to let Americans know that there’s more oil under the North Slope of Alaska than under the sands of Saudi Arabia. 

     Any conscientious, thorough investigation of world oil resources would have to take Williams’ reports into account.  Kunstler failed to do this.  (Jim, check out the Lindsey Williams reports at www.survivalcenter.com/lw.html.

      *Kunstler’s survey of alternative energy resources is painfully under-informed.  He makes no mention of geothermal energy, for instance.  The city of Reno, Nevada, is powered by geothermal.  Why not other cities?  There’s enough energy under our section of the “Ring of Fire” to power every city in the world, for God’s sake.

     About zero point energy, Kunstler confesses he knows nothing.  It wouldn’t have been too difficult for him to find out something.

     For starters, I’d recommend an article titled “The Truth About ZP Technology—A Wake-Up Call to the American People.”  The article, by Celeste Adams, is based on an interview with zero point researcher/inventor Adam Trombly.

     Next stop:  The Integrity Research Institute reports the publication of a new book on zero point:  Zero Point Energy—the Fuel of the Future.  “Authored by a former community college physics and engineering teacher, it is the first book designed for the general public, with lots of visuals.”

     *Intellectually, Kunstler is burdened by reliance upon two obsolete doctrines, and this reliance gives an even darker hue to his dark vision of the post-peak world.  The two doctrines at issue are the “Entropy Law” and the “Malthus doctrine.”

     For a long time, physicists have held that entropy (i.e., disintegration) governs the universe.  The Entropy Law represents life as a one-way path to annihilation.  In his brilliant last book, Cosmography, Buckminster Fuller coined the term “syntropy” to describe the integrative power of universe, and provided a proof that “The universe is twice as powerfully integrating as disintegrating (i.e., twice as powerfully syntropic as entropic).”  Kunster has not (yet) caught on to the Fuller-inspired paradigm shift in physics, and so all that he sees when he looks at the contemporary scene is entropic dwindling.

     Further, Mr. Kunstler is an apologist for the “Second Greatest Pessimist” in English philosophy, Thomas Malthus (1766-1834), whose speculations regarding population have caused endless miseries in the modern world.  (The title of Greatest Pessimist goes to Thomas Hobbes, who was condemned by Parliament in 1666 for his attacks on religion and advocacy of absolutist monarchy.)  In 1798, Malthus, who was trained for the clergy and not science, proposed that populations tend to increase at a geometrical rate whereas the means of sustaining population increases at only an arithmetical rate.  After this idea was enshrined in Darwin’s theory of evolution (1859), it became the “Malthus doctrine.”

     Soon after its original appearance, the Malthus doctrine was enthusiastically embraced by the Old World establishment, as it offered a long-sought-for explanation of the deeply distressing American and French revolutions.  (“Over-population!  Too many bloody people.  Why didn’t we think of that?”)  In no time at all, population control became the principal item on the to-do list of the said establishment.  The possession of colonies acquired new importance as dumping grounds for “surplus population.”  Alas, poor Germany was late in coming to the colony-grab party, and so was compelled—for the sake of survival it was declared—to grab colonies that had been acquired already by the other European powers.  Presto … World War I.

     It’s a pity Kunstler doesn’t know more about the Pandora’s Box of modern history—the Malthusian Mandate to control population.  If he did, he would have right-on-target explanations for the long-time energy-hegemony of the oil industry (my, my, we certainly can’t control populations that are on free energy, can we?) and for the somnolence of the American public.  Enforcers of the Mandate have inflicted more damages on the health and well-being of the American public than I care to think about.  Examples?  How about fluoridation of our drinking water, for starters.  (We owe the discovery that fluoridation of drinking water quells brainstem activity to the Nazis.)  Tainted vaccines, genetically modified organisms, mercury in amalgams, brain-damaging frequencies associated with cell phones … the list goes on and on.  Recently, Gary Null announced that there's a new leading cause of death in American:  Orthodox medicine!  It amazes me that the American public is still functioning at all! 

Waking Up

     Metaphorically, Malthus represented population pressure as the “hare” and food supply as the “tortoise.”  “Finding … that from the laws of nature, we could not proportion the food to the population, our next attempt should naturally be to proportion the population to the food.  If we can persuade the hare to go to sleep, the tortoise may have some chance of overtaking her….”

     Ever since making this proposal, Malthusian regimes have become dispensers of sleeping pills.  Time to wake up.  Kunstler and I are fully in accord on this point.  “If I hope for anything from this book,” Kunstler writes, “it is that the American public will wake up from its sleepwalk and act to defend the project of civilization.”

     Those interested in waking up might start by reading The Long Emergency, which, despite its faults, offers a great deal of important information.  Then, read The Ultimate Resource by the late Dr. Julian Simon, a superb scientist who is dismissed by Kunstler as a “cornucopian.”  Simon offers the latest expose of the Malthusian madness that afflicts our species.  Recovering from this madness, he argues, requires that we come to treasure our most valuable resource—human intelligence and creativity.  

     Along the way, familiarize yourself with the revolutionary work of the cell biologist and evolutionist Dr. Bruce H. Lipton.  Among the conclusions I derive from his work is this:  Marked population increase in not a big problem, but a marker, a sign that our species is approaching its next evolutionary step upward.  Guided by this understanding, we may now conclude that the Malthusian conspiracy is, whatever else it is, a conspiracy against man’s evolution.

Copyright 2007 TDHall
www.biofractalevolution.com